Here is a
cool post at Chapati Mystery, about translating Tamil pulp fiction.
A new DVD of Jodorowski's Santa Sangre, with hours of extra material is coming out soon from the
Severin Films.
Baby Doc is back to Haiti. How strange. Perhaps, now
Aristide will return as well.
In Tunisia,
Slim Amamou, a web activist and a member of the Pirate Party has received the post of a State Secretary of Youth and Sports, a semi-ministerial position in the new transitional government. Reported by
torrentfreak.
Meanwhile,
the emir of Kuwait is handing out $4 bilion in cash and free foood for 18 months to its citizens (80 % of Kuwaiti workforce are employed by the state, making an average of $3,500 a month), ostensibly in celebration of some upcoming jubilees. The food will probably be used to feed a variety of household slaves (Kuwait employs 2 million of mostly South Asian migrant workers). James Traub, at Foreign Policy,
sees this as a reaction to recent events in Tunisia.
Obviously, Egypt is a place to watch. There have been self-immolation there in recent days.
The unemployed youth is a demographic that these authoritarians are reluctant to engage with, and events in Tunisia remind the aging dictators that the new generations must be taught the fear, or temporarily placated.
Hilary Clinton, as can be expected, warns Arab leaders that 'extremists' will fill the void of political power, thus coloring the image of Tunisian uprising with the hues of terrorism. While it might be more instructing to compare what's happened in Tunisia with the riots in France a few years ago, or with the disturbances in Moscow last month. In both cases, it was a death of a young man, an iconic martyr, that served as a trigger for general uprising.
Obama's problem now is how to deal with autocratic governments of those states which are the supposed allies of US in its 'war on terror'. But radical militant Islam is only one of the agents of reaction to the unjust social state in these countries. US finds it easy to criticize just that, because suggesting to the Arab leaders that democratization a la USA is what's needed there can only be taken ironically by those leaders, who know full well that USA has only a sham democracy. Everywhere it is the rule of the rich. This is what Obama administration will try to preserve, most likely. It would be nice to hope for something different, but foolish to actually expect it.
Meanwhile, in Lebanon, the Druze leader decided to side with Hezbollah on the issue of UN tribunal to investigate the death of Harari the elder in 2005. On January 18th, the tribunal passed its sealed indictments to a pretrial judge. Hezbollah denies involvement and condemns the commission as working against Lebanese unity.
Here is one Lebanese woman's take on the tribunal and other matters.
(Which may well be true: the
idea of international law is premised on the idea that there are laws and goods which transcend nationhood. But law is not a science: there is no equivalent in it for the universally binding mathematical formulas. Until there is no such equivalent, an insistence on universal human rights is open to two types of criticism: on the level of critique against a particular person who propounds it; or on the more fundamental level, where one simply doubts that such global discourse of human rights is possible at all. However, the latter may turn out to be be only a way of pessimism, of the stupid reconciliation with reality. It is stupid to reconcile not because resistance is futile, but because it is only most likely futile. Individual life is too short for us to not feel drawn to those who would decrease their own chances of comfortable life by fighting universal battles.
Wow, i feel impressed with myself. But I should, at least, state my own preference, my own view.
be suspicious of heads of repressive states drawing the nationalist card. And watch out: try to catch them when they end up justifying as part of national character something that turns out to be a European importation of the colonial era.
( at this point I should write only after having read
this. The book is worth $150 bucks on Amazon, so it is bound to have some correct answers, right? One of its editors is A Sorbonne law prof. Pierre Legrand, whose name pops up in the table of contents for
this.